About Takshvi

Longevity is
a design decision.

Takshvi is a senior-led digital agency working across web development, CRM implementation, search visibility and automation for B2B and consumer brands.

We specify for the second and third year of a system’s life rather than for its launch week.

12 specialists, senior-led Certified on four platforms 90% stay past year one
Origin

Why Takshvi was established

There is a failure pattern common to digital projects, and it is rarely visible at launch.

The site goes live and performs. The CRM is configured and demonstrated. The campaigns run. Then the agency leaves, and within a year the platform has drifted, the CRM holds data nobody trusts, and no one internally can explain why anything was built the way it was.

The work was not bad. It was built to be delivered rather than built to be kept.

Underneath most of those failures sits the same cause: somebody was sold the wrong solution by a firm that could only sell one thing.

Takshvi was built to be structurally incapable of that. We hold certifications across every platform we deliver on, and our commercial outcome does not change depending on which one we recommend.

Mission

To build systems our clients can still run without us.

Every engagement ends with the source code, the documentation and the credentials in your possession, and a named person on your side who understands why each decision was made. We measure a project by whether it is still in service in year three — not by whether it launched on time.
Specify for year three, not launch week
Name the internal owner before the build begins
Transfer everything at handover, retain nothing as leverage
Vision

A market where platform advice can be trusted, because the adviser gains nothing from it.

Most organisations are sold the platform their agency happens to sell. We would like the opposite to be normal — firms certified across the field, paid identically whichever they specify, publishing the conditions under which they would say no. Until that is normal, we intend to be the demonstration that it works commercially.
Certified across four platforms, biased toward none
Constraints published before contract, not during delivery
Capacity held deliberately below demand
The people

Who you will actually work with

The people who assess your requirement are the people who architect and deliver it. There is no handover to a delivery team, because there is no separate delivery team.

Tushar Makwana
Co-Founder

With 10 years in web development and digital experience, Tushar specializes in HubSpot CMS, WordPress, Webflow, and scalable website development for B2B, technology, and service businesses. Previously with eSparkBiz and Archimedia, he has delivered CMS implementations and digital experiences for international clients. At Takshvi, he leads technology and development. 

Holds the view that

Good development starts with understanding the problem—not choosing the technology.

LinkedIn
Alex Morgan
Co-Founder & Strategy Director

With 10 years of experience in digital strategy and customer experience, Alex works with B2B, technology, and service businesses to turn complex challenges into clear digital solutions. Previously worked with digital consultancies and technology businesses across international markets. At Takshvi, Alex leads strategy, partnerships, and digital direction. 

Holds the view that

Digital strategy is only valuable when it creates clarity—for the business, the team, and the people it serves.

The evidence

How we are paid

The independence claim on every service page is only an assertion until the model behind it is published. This is the model.

We are paid by clients, for work delivered. That is the entire model.

01

Design quality is a commercial variable, not a matter of taste.

Treating it as taste is what makes it expensive to argue about.

02

Most implementations fail on architecture, not adoption.

Training cannot repair a data model that was wrong from the beginning.

03

Documentation is part of the deliverable, not an afterthought.

Work that cannot be explained after we leave has not been finished.

04

A recommendation is only worth having if the adviser gains nothing from it.

This is the reason the firm is structured the way it is.

05

Constraints should be published before contract, not raised during delivery.

Every service page states when we would advise against the service on it.

06

Capacity is a quality control, not a growth problem.

We can hold a limited number of engagements at the standard described here. We would rather decline work than dilute it.

The framework produces a recommendation in a single conversation.

One conversation, followed by a written recommendation: what we would build, in what order, and roughly what it costs. It is yours whether or not you engage us.

We reply within one business day. The recommendation follows within five.